By
Obododimma Oha
Today, I remember my childhood. One aspect of
my childhood I remember with gladness in particular is a discourse about church
as an arbiter, obi ndi ụka, (literally
“the mind of the church person” or “a Christian spirit...”). As children, we
fought a lot over trivialities, but we quickly made up and became friends
again, sharing the little chewables we could find: stale groundnuts, bean
cakes, pieces of bread, biscuits, candies, chewing gum, etc. These were
tempting and there was obi ndi ụka
standing nearby, waiting to settle quarrels and convince us to share. Obi ndi ụka welded a community of
sharers; it was only adulthood that came later to turn the soup sour, to make
the quarrel last long and put heavy luggage on tender hearts. It was
hard-hearted adulthoood that knew the difference between sin and righteousness,
Heaven and Hell. But as children, the law was obi ndi ụka: it quickly settled quarrels and gave us justice.
How was obi
ndi ụka able to work the magic? Two children would have a disagreement,
maybe a fight, and a third party would come forward and throw the obi ndi ụka challenge (considering the
mind of the Christian in the matter) and that would be the reason to forgive. Obi ndi ụka was what one subscribed to
in the catechism class. One would not like to miss Heaven because of another
person and because of a little difference. So, one quickly forgave. One had to
do obi ndi ụka in the matter, not
that one had accepted being treated unjustly or being cheated. One just had to
do obi ndi ụka, to show that there
was a difference, to suffer injustice, hoping that God was taking note. Doing obi ndi ụka was obviously a way of scoring
moral points and moving on. It was the mind of the just, the mind of God. In
that case, only the Devil would not do obi
ndi ụka. Simply this: the Devil must be hard-hearted, we imagined. We would
not like to be like the Devil!
It was considered strange, very strange, for one to be a Christian and not have obi ndi ụka and not be able to do obi ndi ụka. What kind of Christianity was that? It puzzled us and we just had to make sure that we did obi ndi ụka, and God was always the witness.
It was considered strange, very strange, for one to be a Christian and not have obi ndi ụka and not be able to do obi ndi ụka. What kind of Christianity was that? It puzzled us and we just had to make sure that we did obi ndi ụka, and God was always the witness.
Maybe we were very naive and obi ndi ụka was a simplistic
interpretation of the Christian attitude. Maybe it was because of that naivety
that adults have to struggle with camels to enter the eye of a needle but
children are warmly welcome to sit beside the son of God. Maybe our witness is
our witness, standing beside the evidence!
How that discourse of obi ndi ụka easily becomes a
way of seeing things and looking at the world differently. It was because of obi ndi ụka that we were able to be
playmates, sharers, and people who could watch the other’s back as we stole
mangoes or roamed the bushes and shot noisy squirrels. It was because of obi ndi ụka that we were able to be one,
even though from various homesteads. Obi
ndi ụka was a major law, our major guide. To lose it was to lose one’s way.
Come to think of it, obi ndi ụka was a special logic, the reason for a reason. What
reason was greater than a reason? There has to be a reason behind a reason.
Call it “super-reason.” That “super-reason” is superior and over-riding. We
were its subjects.
Indeed, invoking the authentic mind of the
church person was a way of confessing that there is a difference between a fake
and a genuine one. Who would not want to be intepellated and governed by the
genuine one? Who would not want to take sides with it? Who would want the inability
to idenitfy with genuine become the reason for losing? Not me! And so, one was
wholly for obi ndi ụka and supported
its intervention.
It is interesting how that discourse brought
peace. Fighters made up and became friends again. No more aggression. No more
conflict, at least at that point. All were for the other. It was the order of obi ndi ụka. But selfishness belonged
elsewhere. One community of children; one principle of obi ndi ụka.
Has obi
ndi ụka just travelled? I can’t seem to see that beautiful fellow at home!
Where have you gone, obi ndi ụka?
Children of this and that homestead are looking for you. They want you to
touch them. They want you to guide them. They want you to help them to form
community. They want to have a “super-reason.”
No comments:
Post a Comment